Why Property Is Not the Safe Bet It Once Was
The assumption that property is safer and simpler than shares deserves scrutiny in 2026. Here are the eight questions every property investor should be asking.
Bricks and mortar have long held a special place in the Australian investor's psyche. Property feels real in a way that shares do not. But the conditions that made property such a reliable wealth-builder have shifted — and when you examine the full picture, the comparison with shares is far closer than most people assume.
When circumstances change, you cannot sell half a house. The process of selling and settling routinely takes 60–90 days minimum — and longer in a softening market. In an environment of rising rates and uncertainty, liquidity is a form of risk management. Property doesn't offer it.
A $1.2 million property with an $960,000 loan at 6.2% costs ~$59,500 in interest per year. At a 3% rental yield, income is $36,000. The shortfall before rates, insurance, management, and maintenance: over $23,000 per year. The total out-of-pocket cost can easily reach $35,000–$41,500 annually. The investment thesis rests entirely on capital growth eventually dwarfing those losses — which may or may not happen.
One property means one suburb, one structure, one tenant, one local economy. The minimum entry in most capital cities is $700,000–$1 million+. The same capital in a diversified share portfolio would provide exposure to hundreds of businesses across multiple sectors and geographies. Property structurally cannot offer that.
Gross rental yields in Sydney and Melbourne sit at 2.5%–3.5% for most established properties — well below the current mortgage rate of 6%+. After expenses, many investors net 1.5%–2.5%. For those approaching retirement or managing fixed income, sustaining a cashflow-negative asset introduces genuine financial stress.
The May 2026 Federal Budget announced proposed changes to both negative gearing and the CGT discount — but these are not yet law. Budget announcements are policy intentions; they still need to pass Parliament before taking effect. That said, these are the most specific and credible proposals in this space in decades. The Government proposes to limit negative gearing to new builds from 1 July 2027, removing the ability to offset property losses against wage income for established properties purchased after Budget night (13 May 2026). It also proposes to replace the 50% CGT discount with an inflation-based discount and a minimum 30% tax on gains from 1 July 2027. Whether or not these pass in their current form, the direction of travel for property tax concessions is clearly downward — and that is worth factoring into any long-term investment decision today.
Wondering how your investment strategy stacks up?
If you'd like to understand how property fits within a broader plan tailored to your situation, EPG Wealth offers a complimentary 20-minute consultation. Book at epgwealth.com.au or call us today.
Every working Australian gets up and goes to work for a company. We trust that company with our time, our skills, our most productive hours. Yet the moment someone suggests we own a fractional share of the same value-creation engine, the response is often anxiety. The logic doesn't hold: a listed company and an unlisted employer operate on identical principles. The only difference is that one shows you its price every day.
Over 30 years to 2024, the ASX 200 Total Return Index delivered ~9–10.5% p.a. compounded. Australian residential property in major capitals delivered ~7–9% p.a. in capital growth over the same period. When holding costs, transaction costs, and vacancy are applied to property — and when the full dividend benefit is applied to equities — the comparison frequently favours shares.
Dividends grow. A portfolio generating $20,000 in annual income today — assuming 5% annual dividend growth — will generate ~$32,500 in ten years and ~$53,000 in twenty years, without adding a single dollar more. Property rent may grow with CPI. But the landlord also funds maintenance, rates, insurance, and management. And unlike shares, they cannot access a portion of their capital without selling the entire asset.
"The companies we trust enough to borrow from to buy property are, in many cases, the very companies we could simply own. It might be time to ask why we do not."
None of this means property has no place in a portfolio. For the right investor, in the right location, with the right holding capacity, property can still be sound. But the automatic assumption that it is safer, simpler, and more reliable than shares does not survive close scrutiny in 2026.
Property is illiquid, undiversified, debt-heavy, and cashflow-negative at current yields. The May 2026 Budget has also proposed — though not yet legislated — the most significant changes to negative gearing and the CGT discount in decades. Whether those changes pass Parliament in their current form or not, the direction of travel is clear. A well-constructed share portfolio offers liquidity, diversification, growing income, and a return history that competes directly on the numbers. Both asset classes deserve a place in a considered financial plan — but neither should be treated as a default.
Ready to review your investment strategy?
EPG Wealth is a boutique, self-licensed financial planning firm in Sydney. We provide flat-fee, commission-free advice — so our focus is entirely on your outcome.
Book a complimentary 20-minute consultation at epgwealth.com.au or call us today.
Book a Complimentary ConsultationThis article has been prepared by EPG Wealth for general information purposes only. It is not financial product advice and has not been prepared taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider whether any information in this article is appropriate for you before acting on it. We recommend you seek personal financial advice from a licensed financial adviser. EPG Wealth Pty Ltd holds an Australian Financial Services Licence — details at epgwealth.com.au.