When it comes to superannuation, few decisions are as important as nominating who will receive your funds in the event of your passing. Superannuation is often one of the largest assets Australians accumulate over their lifetime, yet it’s not automatically included in your estate. This is why choosing the right nomination type—binding or non-binding—is critical to ensuring your wishes are upheld.
But what exactly are binding and non-binding nominations? How do they differ, and what implications do they have for your loved ones? This guide will break down the differences, explain their pros and cons, and help you decide which option may suit your needs.
What Are Superannuation Nominations?
First, it’s essential to understand the concept of superannuation nominations. A super nomination is a formal instruction to your super fund about who should inherit the balance of your super in the event of your death.
Unlike other assets, your superannuation doesn’t automatically form part of your will unless specified. Instead, trustees of super funds follow your nomination to distribute the funds. This makes it critically important to choose the right type of nomination to protect your legacy and ensure your loved ones are taken care of.
Superannuation nominations fall into two broad categories:
- Binding nominations
- Non-binding nominations
Both have unique features, benefits, and potential downsides.
What Is a Binding Nomination?
A binding nomination is a legally binding instruction to your super fund’s trustee. It ensures that your superannuation balance is distributed exactly as per your wishes, provided the nomination is valid at the time of your death. The trustee has no discretion and must follow your instructions.
Key Features of a Binding Nomination
- Control: Ensures your super is paid to the specific person(s) you nominate.
- Clarity: Reduces the likelihood of disputes among family members or beneficiaries.
- Regular Updates Required: Binding nominations typically expire after three years (unless made non-lapsing), requiring renewal to stay valid.
Benefits of a Binding Nomination
- Certainty and Peace of Mind: Since the trustee must adhere to your instructions, you can rest assured that your wishes will be honoured.
- Minimised Disputes: Clear instructions reduce the potential for disagreements among potential beneficiaries.
Drawbacks of a Binding Nomination
- Rigidity: Binding nominations cannot accommodate changes in circumstances unless you update them. For example, changes like divorce or the addition of a new family member may require you to revisit and renew your nominated beneficiaries.
- Regular Reviews Needed: Lapsing nominations require renewal every three years, adding to your administrative responsibilities.
Who Should Consider a Binding Nomination?
Binding nominations are ideal for individuals who want complete control over the distribution of their super and those looking to avoid potential disputes among family members.
What Is a Non-Binding Nomination?
A non-binding nomination, by contrast, serves as a guideline for the trustee of your superannuation fund. While the trustee considers your instructions, they retain the discretion to distribute the funds based on other factors, including the circumstances surrounding your beneficiaries.
Key Features of a Non-Binding Nomination
- Flexibility: Allows the trustee to consider each beneficiary’s circumstances, such as financial status or dependents, before making a decision.
- Guidance, Not Instruction: The trustee may not necessarily follow your nomination if they deem alternative arrangements more appropriate.
Benefits of a Non-Binding Nomination
- Adaptability: Trustees can adjust distribution based on beneficiaries’ current circumstances, which is especially helpful for complex family dynamics.
- No Expiry: Non-binding nominations do not lapse, so you don’t need to renew them regularly.
Drawbacks of a Non-Binding Nomination
- Uncertainty: The trustee’s discretion may result in outcomes that don’t align perfectly with your wishes.
- Potential for Disputes: Beneficiaries might disagree with the trustee’s decision, leading to conflicts or legal challenges.
Who Should Consider a Non-Binding Nomination?
Non-binding nominations suit individuals who trust the trustee to make fair decisions or those navigating dynamic family circumstances where a degree of flexibility is advantageous.
Binding vs. Non-Binding Nominations: Key Differences
Below is a quick comparison to highlight the main differences between the two options:
| Feature | Binding Nomination | Non-Binding Nomination |
| Legal Enforceability | Legally binding—trustee must follow your nomination. | Trustee has discretion to consider (but not follow) your wishes. |
| Flexibility | Less flexible—must update regularly or when circumstances change. | Flexible—adjusted based on beneficiaries’ circumstances. |
| Renewal Requirements | Typically lapses every 3 years unless non-lapsing. | Does not require renewal. |
| Dispute Potential | Low—reduces family disputes thanks to clear instructions. | Higher potential for disputes over trustee’s decisions. |
| Best For | Individuals seeking full control over super distribution. | Those needing flexibility or dealing with changing family dynamics. |
How to Choose the Right Option
Choosing between a binding or non-binding nomination depends on your personal goals, family dynamics, and level of confidence in the trustee’s discretion. Here are some considerations to guide your decision:
- Assess Your Family Situation
- Blended Families: Binding nominations provide clarity and prevent disputes, particularly in complex family arrangements involving children from multiple relationships.
- Dependents with Changing Needs: Non-binding nominations allow for flexibility to consider changes in dependents’ financial circumstances.
- Review Your Financial Goals: If you have clear financial goals—such as ensuring a specific person receives your super balance or paying off a beneficiary’s debt—a binding nomination may be more suitable.
- Evaluate Your Trustee’s Role: Do you trust your super fund’s trustee to make fair and informed decisions, or do you prefer to make those decisions yourself?
- Seek Professional Advice: Both binding and non-binding nominations come with unique legal and financial implications. Consulting a financial adviser or estate planner can help you decide which option aligns best with your needs.
Reviewing and Updating Your Nominations
Regardless of which type of nomination you choose, periodic reviews are essential to ensuring it remains relevant. Changes in family circumstances, such as marriage, divorce, or the birth of a child, often require updates.
Final Thoughts
Whether you choose a binding or non-binding nomination, selecting the right superannuation beneficiary arrangement gives you peace of mind knowing your wishes will be respected and your loved ones supported.
By understanding the key differences and factors influencing your decision, you can create a nomination strategy tailored to your unique circumstances. For further clarity and guidance, consider consulting a financial adviser who can assist with tailoring your nominations to match your goals and securing your financial legacy.
If you would like to improve your current investment strategies or are looking to start your investment journey, click here to organise a complimentary 20-minute phone call with an EPG Wealth adviser.